I should have read nanostuff's comment more carefully before posting: nothing to add to that.
Terminal, doesn't that make sense? Otherwise you could get a temporary advantage (e.g. by killing the opponent's mage in an all out effort that leaves you exposed) and then quit.
The next thing you have to do is ensure a quit is marked as a loss under any circumstances. Don't trivialize a quitter with arbitrary weighting of game state. You quit, you lose. Simple, logical and perfectly appropriate. It makes no sense to have a good player's victory be held hostage by an amateur with the fortune of having a temporarily higher score despite losing circumstances. It trivializes the whole point of a strategic victory.
Hopefully I got most of the errors, let me know if any problemz!!!
Looks like it's back up and no errors so far...woot!
But what's with an enemy quitting while he's ahead and getting no score and undecided?
Comments are not available for this entry.
Archives
